No problem about the photo.CasperGriswoldBacon wrote:thanks k9-70 but sticking it at that resolution would create a file about 700meg according to my scanner and it would be one hell of an e-mailGod knows how you managed to make out any more numbers because i can't, but if it is the LNWR 1P CLASS, i think it should be 66-- or 67--
Found a better photo of the ex LNWR 1p at the link below.
http://www.warwickshirerailways.com/lms/lnwrcov268.htm