NRM Article - Tunnels

Articles which have been added to the main site
pete12345

Re: Article: Tunnels

Post by pete12345 »

I agree with what Graham says- if you have to make one part over or under-scale, keep everything else in proportion. Having a tunnel that is slightly overscale looks much better than one that is the correct height, but too wide- it will look squashed up. The same goes for 00 trackwork. Having the sleepers at HO scale spacing (therefore underscale for 00) looks much better than spacing out the sleepers and leaving the track gauge underscale (unless you want a narrow gauge look :wink: )

Pete
gppsoftware
Posts: 310
Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 5:34 am

Re: Article: Tunnels

Post by gppsoftware »

pete12345 wrote:I agree with what Graham says- if you have to make one part over or under-scale, keep everything else in proportion. Having a tunnel that is slightly overscale looks much better than one that is the correct height, but too wide- it will look squashed up. The same goes for 00 trackwork. Having the sleepers at HO scale spacing (therefore underscale for 00) looks much better than spacing out the sleepers and leaving the track gauge underscale (unless you want a narrow gauge look :wink: )

Pete
Thanks Pete.

I should correct myself. I wrote that my model was of the Western end of Dainton tunnel. It is actually the Eastern end - the two are quite different in appearance but have the same tunnel mouth size/profile.

Graham Plowman
Post Reply