LMS Pug 11234

Discuss real world railway operations in this forum. Find out how to make your model railway as accurate as possible.
User avatar
6C
Posts: 1192
Joined: Fri Feb 15, 2008 1:45 pm
Location: Pingvollr, dans le Wirrale

Re: LMS Pug 11234

Postby 6C » Sat Jan 06, 2018 11:59 am

1338 + 1142 are preserved with quite a few photos on the net
Pete

Fetch me a bottle of your finest Chateau Bichon Frise '65 !!

User avatar
Bufferstop
Posts: 10650
Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2010 12:06 pm
Location: Bottom end of N. Warks line

Re: LMS Pug 11234

Postby Bufferstop » Sat Jan 06, 2018 3:36 pm

1101-6 were side tanks and not saddle tanks

Yes they were Pete, apart from the lowered cab roof, lookalikes of Cadbury No 1, at lest until Swindon got at them. :D I only referred to them as dock shunters. There was precious little evidence of the boiler barrel, just a slight hump down the centre line from the cab to the back edge of the smokebox. If they were operated in the same manner as Cadbury's were, the minimal coal bunker at the rear of the LH tank would be over filled and piled up above the firebox, held in check by some improvised rails.
Growing old, can't avoid it. Growing up, forget it!
My Layout, My Workbench Blog and My Opinions

User avatar
swiftbeam
Posts: 71
Joined: Thu Dec 07, 2017 11:09 am

Re: LMS Pug 11234

Postby swiftbeam » Sun Jan 07, 2018 12:20 pm

1396 seemed to exist
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cornwall_ ... y_1396.jpg

So did the other numbers 1393-1399 ??
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cornwall_Minerals_Railway

I'm confused. I guess it's going to have to be a case of 'It's my railway' :D

User avatar
Bufferstop
Posts: 10650
Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2010 12:06 pm
Location: Bottom end of N. Warks line

Re: LMS Pug 11234

Postby Bufferstop » Sun Jan 07, 2018 2:23 pm

Yup, if it's a never was, or a never would have been, you have to invoke rule 1 and be a bit inventive. :D
Growing old, can't avoid it. Growing up, forget it!
My Layout, My Workbench Blog and My Opinions

User avatar
6C
Posts: 1192
Joined: Fri Feb 15, 2008 1:45 pm
Location: Pingvollr, dans le Wirrale

Re: LMS Pug 11234

Postby 6C » Mon Jan 08, 2018 10:01 am

Think the CMR used 0-6-0STs rather more than 0-4-0s....could be wrong
Pete

Fetch me a bottle of your finest Chateau Bichon Frise '65 !!

User avatar
Dragonfly
Posts: 360
Joined: Mon Jan 24, 2011 7:49 am
Location: Stoke on Trent
Contact:

Re: LMS Pug 11234

Postby Dragonfly » Wed Jan 10, 2018 1:13 am

He may have been replying to my post, as I'd suggested those numbers as unused.
=Doug
| Dragonfly | Current projects: Kidneston (00) / Clatter (N) / Much Oakley (N) / Workbench |

User avatar
swiftbeam
Posts: 71
Joined: Thu Dec 07, 2017 11:09 am

Re: LMS Pug 11234

Postby swiftbeam » Thu Jan 11, 2018 8:51 pm

I ordered two plates.
I was totally confused about numbers so went with 1342 !!
It's my railway and there seems to be no clear answer to what this loco would have had if it were real now.

rebaz
Posts: 1
Joined: Tue Dec 12, 2017 6:32 am

Re: LMS Pug 11234

Postby rebaz » Mon Feb 12, 2018 6:55 am

I have the same thing to say as the third comment about that
Graduated from Soran University with First Class Degree with Honours in Computer Science


Return to “Real World Railways”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests