Chipboard Baseboard

Discussion of model railway baseboard design and construction
kjiwizard
Posts: 102
Joined: Tue Jul 26, 2011 2:28 pm
Location: Faversham, Kent

Re: Chipboard Baseboard

Post by kjiwizard »

Oh yes its well sturdy, I forgot to mention the over engineering of the framework. It sits on 3" x 2". :D
User avatar
stuartp
Posts: 1244
Joined: Sat Feb 28, 2009 7:40 pm

Re: Chipboard Baseboard

Post by stuartp »

kjiwizard wrote:I am getting worried now reading the anti chipboard posts.
I wouldn't worry too much, these are chipboard (albeit recently rebuilt on a nice ply frame to replace the hotch potch of bits of second hand timber they were originally screwed to) and they haven't warped in 20 years. i've had loads of problems but all of my own making - piecemeal extentions using melamine-faced chipboard of a different thickness, packing the track on off-cuts of balsa and card rather than cork, changing the track layout a few times, not building them square in the first place... None caused by warping.

Image

Having said all that, if I was starting again I would use ply, if only on the grounds of weight. There's an extension board to the right of that pic which is built from foamboard - I can pick it up with one finger but it's not really sturdy enough without framing it in ply.

Talking of crap that goes into chipboard, I once stripped all the teeth off a jigsaw blade sawing up a sheet of 12mm chipboard for a diorama base. A pebble fell out.
Portwilliam - Southwest Scotland in the 1960s, in OO - http://stuart1968.wordpress.com/
User avatar
Flashbang
Posts: 4091
Joined: Thu Oct 18, 2007 1:07 pm
Location: SE United Kingdom
Contact:

Re: Chipboard Baseboard

Post by Flashbang »

kjiwizard wrote:I am getting worried now reading the anti chipboard posts.
<Snip>
Hi
There is nothing wrong with chipboard! I have used formerly on at least three layouts. One was a portable exhibition layout too.
I never have a problem with it sagging, but it was well braced on 2" x 1" PSE framing.
The chipboard and the framing was also coated with varnish as the layouts were all stored in a remote from the house garage.
As I said in my first post on page 1 ... Chipboard. Very heavy and almost as hard to drive those Peco track pins into as MDF. Crumbles after several years too (Or at least the older types of Chipboard did).
If you're happy with its weight and its hardness, then I see no problems. :D
[Image << Click the Icon to go to my website
Broken? It was working correctly when I left it.
User avatar
Stanier
Posts: 61
Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2008 7:46 pm
Location: Scottish Borders

Re: Chipboard Baseboard

Post by Stanier »

While I appreciate that some of you have had no problems with chipboard I have had some pretty horrible experiences. Obviously if you stiffen it enough with wood you may avoid the worst things, but weight will get you. I have two legacy chipboard boards in the fiddle area of my layout. They sit on MFI kitchen units which gives them a lot of support and they seem to be OK after nearly twenty years. However you need to know that my outfit resides in a custom built room in the house which is air conditioned (keeps the track clean) and temperature controlled to 2 degrees C so this performance cannot be taken as typical. Before I went the plywood route I used 'open frame' boards where only the trackbed was plywood supported on a wooden sub-structure. This is also quite light but needs a bit more carpentry than the plywood box construction. You pays your money and takes your choice of back problems. I wouldn't change back now.
I am completing my 4mm layout of Killiecrankie. I am the LMS Society carriage person.
nickbrad
Posts: 810
Joined: Fri Jan 15, 2010 11:53 am
Location: Lincoln, UK

Re: Chipboard Baseboard

Post by nickbrad »

Stanier wrote:.....custom built room in the house which is air conditioned (keeps the track clean) and temperature controlled to 2 degrees C so this performance cannot be taken as typical....
Is that a typo or do you have to dress like an eskimo to operate your layout? :lol:
User avatar
Essex2Visuvesi
Posts: 2318
Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2008 4:51 pm
Location: Finland, Finland, Finland!

Re: Chipboard Baseboard

Post by Essex2Visuvesi »

nickbrad wrote:
Stanier wrote:.....custom built room in the house which is air conditioned (keeps the track clean) and temperature controlled to 2 degrees C so this performance cannot be taken as typical....
Is that a typo or do you have to dress like an eskimo to operate your layout? :lol:
I think he means +/- 2 deg C
Si quam primum vos operor non successio , impono

The only stupid question is the one I didn't ask

Proud member of the OAM
(Order of the Armchair Modeller
tractor37
Posts: 736
Joined: Sat Feb 19, 2011 12:27 am
Location: North Yorkshire
Contact:

Re: Chipboard Baseboard

Post by tractor37 »

Was this post originally asking for advice or has it turned into a chipboard bashing thread? As long as the room isn't damp, prone to excessive rise and falls in temperature then there will not be any kind of problem regarding the choice of material.
Yes it is cheap, which would free up money to insulate or clad better the area in use making the user much more comfortable which I'm sure is far more practical for long term use and the quality of the stock to...
Everyone is going to have their favourite methods and materials to use. Remember a lot of people on here are quite young and therefore probably not as finacially solvent as some who have paid off mortgages and progressed up their chosen career ladder.
And yes I have chipboard, 18mm braced on a 2x2 frame every 4ft. My primary reason for using it was I had access to about 500 sheets for nothing! I used it as a work surface to hold my hefty weight also when I altered all the interior insulation in the loft and haven't witnessed a mm of movement within nearly 2 years.... :D
Image
47FAN
Posts: 27
Joined: Sat Apr 18, 2009 4:54 pm

Re: Chipboard Baseboard

Post by 47FAN »

Hi

I think the latest post above says it all. I have successfully used chipboard for years without any swelling, warping or movement, because a very strong timber grid frame underneath hold the lot together. Yes it is heavy but perhaps more durable than plywood in the end!
b308
Posts: 5106
Joined: Sat Apr 15, 2006 5:48 pm
Location: North Worcs

Re: Chipboard Baseboard

Post by b308 »

Blimey! Talk about resurrecting old threads!!

You'll find a lot more about baseboards and their construction in more recent threads, 47Fan! I used chipboard when I was much younger, and in a permanent layout in a dry place that isn't likely to be moved for donkey's years then it's ok and, primarily, it's cheap... But there are a lot better materials for use as baseboard surfaces, believe me, I've tried them!

Rather than continue with this thread I'd suggest that you look at some more recent ones where the pros and cons have been discussed at length...
castlespitfire
Posts: 68
Joined: Tue Oct 27, 2015 1:59 am

Re: Chipboard Baseboard

Post by castlespitfire »

strangeworld57 wrote:Hi all. This is the first time ive posted anything here.

I would like as many peoples opinions as possible.
I am building a baseboard 9ft by 5ft which i will split into 3 sections of 3ft by 5 ft. I will be using chipboard and timber for the frame and i will be buying some flatpack chester of drawers to use as the legs(my way of creating a bit of storage)
my reason is for this is cost.
any one who would like to comment on this please give me your opinions
Hi SW,,,,,,,,,,,, Have been making baseboards from timber frames and chip board for many years. Have used it in loft and in sheds which both had damp problems in winter because of weather and also use the stuff inside the house as well. Apart from the fact it is heavier than ply I have never had any problems with it warping cracking or anything else for that matter. My latest baseboards I used 12mm plywood because lots of people were saying that it was better than chip board. I now must say that i have had more trouble with the ply than I ever had from chipboard. I do not not agree that ply is better than chipboard and if I build any more new baseboards will be using chip again. When it come to warping ply is much more likely to warp than chipboard in fact some of the ply which was delivered to me was warped from new. One of the boards was so badly warped it was scrapped and used of small sections on level two. I have never had problems like that using chipboard. Far as I am concerned ply wood is very expensive and the extra cost is just worth it. The only advantage with ply is it is lighter than chip. Sometimes I think people just like change for change sake.
Love the idea of chest of drawers for supports. I used kitchen base units for my last build and now have plenty of under storage space for all my railways stuff.
It was working yesterday last time I used it................... John
User avatar
Emettman
Posts: 2253
Joined: Fri Jun 20, 2014 4:43 pm
Location: Cornwall UK
Contact:

Re: Chipboard Baseboard

Post by Emettman »

castlespitfire wrote:
strangeworld57 wrote:...and i will be buying some flatpack chester of drawers to use as the legs(my way of creating a bit of storage)
my reason is for this is cost.
Hi SW,,,,,,,,,,,
Love the idea of chest of drawers for supports. I used kitchen base units for my last build and now have plenty of under storage space for all my railways stuff.

I'll add to an emerging consensus(?): n'owt wrong with chipboard for layouts, main exemption being for portable layouts or removable sections where weight can be a ruling factor.
I also have used cheap flatpack furniture (and on another occasion plastic shelf units) as the sub structure, for convenience, storage and neat appearance.
Once on a mobile, but not portable, layout.
Image
16 x 5, G scale for a hospital children's ward.
The whole thing on castors for cleaning purposes, 2 x 1 strapped each furniture clump together, and suitcase latches held the three clumps as one assembly.

Chris.
"It's his madness that keeps him sane."
castlespitfire
Posts: 68
Joined: Tue Oct 27, 2015 1:59 am

Re: Chipboard Baseboard

Post by castlespitfire »

Thats what I call belt and braces Why Not. It must have weighed a ton. Bet your framing is 4x2. LOL. ............ John
It was working yesterday last time I used it................... John
castlespitfire
Posts: 68
Joined: Tue Oct 27, 2015 1:59 am

Re: Chipboard Baseboard

Post by castlespitfire »

Stanier wrote:I thought the OP would have taken note of the advice that chipboard is a no-no for baseboards these days. It is basically unstable and will change its shape without much warning no matter how much stiffening you do.
Hi Stanier you are a ply wood man I can tell. You know my first layout which I built in the 1960s was 2x1 framed covered in 1/2 inch chipboard. That layout is still in use after having several railways built on it over the years and it is now in my Nephews house and his kids still use it and it is still nice and flat in good condition showing obvious signs of ware. Thats not bad for nearly 50 years is it. Some of the ply wood I ordered last year for my present construction, one sheet of which was delivered so badly warped it was only suitable for level two or upper levels in smaller pieces.
As I am not into aviation never really thought of building aircraft wings. ...........John
It was working yesterday last time I used it................... John
User avatar
TimberSurf
Posts: 2536
Joined: Wed Jan 08, 2014 5:47 pm
Location: N.Wales
Contact:

Re: Chipboard Baseboard

Post by TimberSurf »

Having worked in the chipboard industry.....Yes, chipboard is heavier than ply........
The real difference is, there is none! Both are manufactured with a hydroscopic (water absorbing) glue and will laminate/warp if allowed to get damp. Its the wood that absorbs the water and expands. Either will distort if allowed to get damp.
The only guarantee to ensure either stays flat is to buy waterproof variants, available in both, but hellishly more expensive! (Check grades, glue type makes a huge difference)
Image
Lumsdonia <--- Hit link to go to my website for full story and wiring advice!
castlespitfire
Posts: 68
Joined: Tue Oct 27, 2015 1:59 am

Re: Chipboard Baseboard

Post by castlespitfire »

TimberSurf wrote:Having worked in the chipboard industry.....Yes, chipboard is heavier than ply........
The real difference is, there is none! Both are manufactured with a hydroscopic (water absorbing) glue and will laminate/warp if allowed to get damp. Its the wood that absorbs the water and expands. Either will distort if allowed to get damp.
The only guarantee to ensure either stays flat is to buy waterproof variants, available in both, but hellishly more expensive! (Check grades, glue type makes a huge difference)
This has to be the best reply up to now. Dont think any of us modellers was thinking of using the chipboard anywhere other than inside a building. I had a large layout years ago using ordinary chipboard which was in a cold damp loft in winter anyway. That survived for many years and part of it is still in use. That it 45 years old now.
It was working yesterday last time I used it................... John
Post Reply